You are browsing the archive for firm.

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Greenhill profit jumps as investors fret

July 18, 2011 in Banking Industry News


NEW YORK |
Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:01pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Boutique financial advisory firm Greenhill Co (GHL.N) posted better-than-expected second-quarter earnings on Sunday, rushing the results out after reports on departures at the firm hit the company’s stock.

Greenhill shares closed down more than 12 percent at $46.50 on Friday in response to the departure of Tim George, a member of the firm’s management committee. The firm has also lost two other managing directors since June.

A Greenhill spokesman said the departures this year have had no measurable impact on its current assignments, and that it would be wrong to assume that the departures would have a meaningful impact on earnings.

Greenhill said it earned $21.5 million, or 69 cents a share, in the quarter, up from $17.6 million, or 57 cents a share, a year earlier. The results had been expected to be released later this week.

Analysts, on average, had expected earnings of 33 cents a share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Revenue rose 9 percent to $90.8 million in the quarter, driven by a 38 percent surge in revenue from the firm’s financial advisory activities.

The company founded by Robert Greenhill, the former president of Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and former chairman and chief executive of Smith Barney, said deals that closed in the second quarter — like the sale of Alcon Inc to Novartis AG (NOVN.VX) — helped its results.

The company is also advising ATT (T.N) on its $39 billion bid for T-Mobile.

“We are seeing a significant rebound in North American activity, continued strength in Australia and the beginnings of a rebound from an extended difficult period in Europe,” Chairman Robert Greenhill said in a statement.

“While our current level of productivity remains far below what we achieved historically, we believe we are well positioned to return to our historic level of productivity as and when transaction activity continues to rebound.”

(Reporting by Michael Erman; Editing by Richard Chang)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

UBS wins review of Madoff trustee’s $2.6 bln suits

July 15, 2011 in Banking Industry News


NEW YORK |
Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:50pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) – UBS AG won review by a Manhattan federal judge of $2.6 billion of lawsuits brought by the trustee liquidating Bernard Madoff’s firm, at least the fourth time a bank has obtained access to that court.

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon agreed to accept the two UBS (UBSN.VX)(UBS.N) lawsuits, which accused the Swiss bank and various “feeder funds” that steered money to Madoff of profiting from and covering up his Ponzi scheme.

Her decision is a setback to the trustee, Irving Picard, who has filed roughly 1,050 lawsuits seeking more than $103 billion for Madoff’s victims, and has been trying to pursue his cases in bankruptcy court.

But banks and some other targets of Picard’s lawsuits have said the trustee is raising issues that cannot be addressed by a bankruptcy judge, and should be handled in a federal district court, a higher tribunal. District courts also allow for trial by jury, while a bankruptcy court does not.

A spokeswoman for Picard did not immediately return a request for comment.

McMahon has also agreed to handle Picard’s $19.9 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase Co (JPM.N).

Another federal judge, Jed Rakoff, is considering whether Picard can invoke racketeering law in a $58.8 billion lawsuit against Italy’s UniCredit SpA (CRDI.MI), Austria’s Bank Medici AG and its founder Sonja Kohn, and other defendants.

Rakoff is also reviewing some issues in Picard’s $9 billion lawsuit against HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA.L), as well as his $1 billion lawsuit against Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz, owners of the New York Mets baseball team.

UBS had in a June 21 court filing questioned Picard’s standing to raise some claims, and said his common law claims were preempted under a 1998 federal law concerning class-action lawsuits, the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act.

“I am only interested in dealing with the threshold issues now — SLUSA preemption and standing,” McMahon wrote on a July 12 letter from UBS’ lawyers. “I don’t want to deal with other issues.”

In February, JPMorgan (JPM.N) raised similar concerns, accusing Picard of effectively pursuing “an enormous backdoor class action to recoup damages incurred by individuals and entities other than the firm to which he is the appointed successor.”

On Thursday evening, McMahon directed Picard to explain several matters by the end of business on Friday, including why he filed two UBS lawsuits.

She also said she does not plan to consolidate the UBS and JPMorgan cases, but that the SLUSA and standing issues should be considered “at the same time, and on the same schedule.”

Madoff, 73, is serving a 150-year prison sentence.

The cases are Picard v. UBS AG et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Nos. 11-04212 and 11-04213.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, editing by Bernard Orr and Lisa Shumaker)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

BHP Billiton swoops on gas firm Petrohawk for $12.1 billion

July 15, 2011 in Banking Industry News


SYDNEY/PERTH |
Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:16pm EDT

SYDNEY/PERTH (Reuters) – Top global miner BHP Billiton will buy U.S. gas producer Petrohawk Energy Corp for $12.1 billion, ramping up its bets on the booming but environmentally controversial shale gas industry.

The agreed all-cash deal is pitched at a 65 percent premium to Petrohawk last-traded share price, and follows BHP’s $4.75 billion purchase of Chesapeake Energy’s interest in an Arkansas shale gas field in February.

Peter Chilton, portfolio manager at Constellation Capital Management, said he believed BHP felt secure about the premium being paid and was positioning itself for a U.S. economic rebound.

“Their view on their first shale buy was they were buying at bottom-of-the-cycle prices. I guess they see value here,” he said. “With oil prices where they are, it’s pretty hard to find opportunities that are not fully priced.”

BHP, known as “The Big Australian” has run into repeated regulatory hurdles with deals in its mining operations and its $39 billion bid for Canada’s Potash Corp was stymied by regulators last year.

CEO Marius Kloppers said the company was “very highly” likely to be involved in further consolidation in the petroleum industry.

CASH GOES TO WORK

BHP will use its abundant cash reserves to fund the deal, which comes at time when companies are looking to snap up raw materials to fuel strong demand from emerging markets.

This week alone, $24.9 billion worth of Asia resource-related deals have been announced, according to Thomson Reuters data.

BHP said that once the Petrohawk deal was completed, it embark on aggressive spending of more than $40 billion over the next decade to develop Petrohawk’s three major fields, all in the “sweet spot” for shale gas in the southern United States.

“This transaction will have extremely strong returns and development potential for a very, very long time,” BHP’s petroleum chief, J. Michael Yeager, told a briefing, adding it could more than double the division’s existing resource base.

The acquisition gives BHP a risked resource base of 35 trillion cubic feet equivalent, the firm said, adding there was a break fee in the deal of $395 million.

Petrohawk shares last closed at $23.49 compared with the $38.75 offer price. BHP shares fell 2 percent to A$42.76, lagging the broader market, with some analysts now questioning its ability to continue fund more multi-billion-dollar share buybacks.

BHP Chief Executive Marius Kloppers would not be drawn on this issue. “I don’t want to rule in or rule out additional buy-backs…,” he told the briefing.

But Perpetual fund manager James Bruce said the Petrohawk deal should not halt more capital returns. “This is a company with significant cash flows and there are options for the board to increase the dividend and/or announce another buyback.”

HUGE POTENTIAL VS ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS

Petrohawk’s assets cover about 1 million net acres in Texas and Louisiana, with estimated 2011 net production of around 950 million cubic feet equivalent per day, or 158,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day.

BHP is targeting shale gas as it emerges as a major source of cleaner-burning fuel in a world increasingly looking for alternatives to coal-fired energy. Gas produces about half the emissions of coal when burned to make electricity, BHP said.

“If the whole continent of Australia used electricity sourced from natural gas…this thing we purchased would supply that need for 18 years,” said BHP’s Yeager, illustrating the resource base to a briefing of mostly Australian analysts.

The International Energy Agency has said around 40 percent of the increase in global gas production between now and 2035 will come from unconventional gas exploration, such as fracking shale gas or coalbed methane gas, also known as coal seam gas.

BHP estimated shale gas would account for half of total the U.S. gas market by 2030 and also noted shale gas can provide returns in months, compared with the five years or more of development required to bring offshore oil and gas on stream.

But shale gas is also beset by environmental concerns.

Since March 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies have been reviewing the environmental and health impact of shale gas drilling, which could mean new regulations on the sector.

In April, a blowout of a natural gas well in Pennsylvania spewed thousands of gallons of drilling fluid that contaminated local waterways and intensified debate over a shale drilling method called hydraulic fracturing or “fracking.”

NEW BHP STRATEGY

In targeting shale gas, BHP is biting off smaller deals than the blockbuster takeovers it has tried and failed to secure over the past three years, including the Potash Corp bid.

Early in his tenure as BHP CEO Kloppers also launched an audacious but ultimately mistimed play for rival Rio Tinto just before the global credit crisis in 2008. He later attempted a $116 billion merger of BHP and rival Rio Tinto’s iron ore businesses, but that too failed.

In the latest deal, BHP is advised by Barclays Capital and Scotia Waterous, and Petrohawk is advised by Goldman Sachs.

(Additional reporting and writing by Mark Bendeich in Sydney and Victoria Thieberger in Melbourne; Editing by Balazs Koranyi, Ed Davies and Lincoln Feast)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Indian shares rise 0.5 pct; lenders lead

July 13, 2011 in Banking Industry News


MUMBAI, July 13 |
Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:50pm EDT

MUMBAI, July 13 (Reuters) – Indian shares gained 0.5 percent
in early trade on Wednesday, with financials leading the gains,
taking cues from firm Asian markets.

At 9:16 a.m. (0346 GMT), the 30-share BSE index was
up 0.49 percent at 18,502.61 points, with 27 components
advancing.

The 50-share NSE index was up 0.6 percent at
5,560.05.

(Reporting by Ami Shah)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Company of disgraced China tycoon bids for British aircraft carrier

July 13, 2011 in Banking Industry News


HONG KONG, July 13 |
Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:00am EDT

HONG KONG, July 13 (Reuters) – Eagle Vantage Asset
Management, a Hong Kong-based investment firm controlled by
disgraced Chinese tycoon Huang Guangyu, has put a bid for
decomissioned British aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal, planning
to turn the warship into a floating showground for hi-tech
products.

“We put a bid in May and the results will come up later this
month,” Eagle Vantage spokesman Zhao Qiguang told Reuters. He
declined to give details of the bid or how much the firm would
invest in the project.

Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported on Wednesday
that Huang’s company would tow the carrier to Hong Kong or Macau
before refitting it.

Huang was not involved in the bidding process, or the
management’s decision to enter a bid, Zhao added.

Huang, the founder of Gome Electrical Appliance Holding Ltd
, has been serving a 14-year prison sentence in China
since May for bribery and insider trading. Huang has been
fighting for control of China’s second-largest home appliance
retailer, in which he is a controlling shareholder with about a
one-third stake.

Gome was not involved in the aircraft carrier auction and
Eagle Vantage was not a subsidiary of the Hong Kong-listed
company, a Gome spokeswoman said.

The tender for the 19,000-tonne light aircraft carrier
closed on July 6, according to an advertisement on the website
of Britain’s Disposal Services Authority.

(Reporting by Donny Kwok; Editing by Chris Lewis)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Trina Solar audit committee chief resigns; stock drops

July 13, 2011 in Global Markets News


LOS ANGELES |
Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:40pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Trina Solar Ltd said the chairman of its audit committee had resigned from its board, sending the Chinese solar company’s shares down more than 11 percent.

Peter Mak resigned effective July 10 “to focus on other personal and professional pursuits,” Trina said in a statement on Tuesday.

Mak is also chief financial officer of A-Power Energy Generation Systems Ltd, although his contract with the Chinese power plant developer is due to expire this week.

A-Power’s independent auditor, MSCM LLP, resigned late last month because the company did not hire an independent forensic accounting firm to evaluate transactions, as required. Three of A-Power’s directors have resigned since then, and the company has warned that it would delay its annual report to securities regulators.

“The bottom line is that Trina shareholders should be pleased that Mak with his checkered past has left the board,” Raymond James analyst Pavel Molchanov said in a client note. “It is fundamentally erroneous to infer that Trina’s accounting has been somehow flawed purely because of Mak’s prior work at A-Power.”

Jerome Corcoran, another Trina director, is replacing Mak as chairman of the audit committee, of which he was previously a member.

Trina stock was down 11.4 percent at $17.50, making it the second-biggest percentage loser on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares had hit a 13-month low earlier in the session.

“This certainly should raise alarm bells and make people a little more cautious,” Morningstar analyst Stephen Simko said. “There is going to be a lot of focus on their accounting.”

The news came a day after rating agency Moody’s Investors Service raised warnings about accounting and corporate governance risks at dozens of China-based companies, leading to a sharp drop in their shares and bonds on Tuesday. Neither Trina nor A-Power was among the companies Moody’s reviewed in the report.

Meanwhile, the implied volatility in Trina options surged on increased put volume after the news, said WhatsTrading.com options strategist Frederic Ruffy.

Implied volatility, a barometer of anxiety and a key component of an options price, measures in percentage terms the expected magnitude of share price movement.

Trina option volume was 7.8 times greater than average daily turnover with about 34,000 puts and 17,000 calls traded by early afternoon on Tuesday, according to options analytics firm Trade Alert.

Also on Tuesday, Trina said Yeung Kwok On, one of its directors, would replace Corcoran as chairman of the board’s corporate governance and nominating committee. Board member Qian Zhao will replace Mak on that committee.

Trina’s news came as a revenue and margin warning from Chinese wafer maker ReneSola Ltd sparked a sell-off in most solar stocks.

(Additional reporting by Doris Frankel in Chicago; editing by John Wallace and Lisa Von Ahn)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Core BSkyB investors bet on rebound as others flee

July 12, 2011 in Global Markets News


LONDON |
Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:57pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) – A core of large investors in BSkyB (BSY.L) is planning to stick with it regardless of the outcome of a bid by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp (NWSA.O) to take it over — now hanging in the balance — and as others dumped the shares on Monday.

Three of five institutional shareholders, who together hold around 8 percent of the stock not owned by News Corp, told Reuters that BSkyB was a fundamentally strong firm, with two stating they might buy more shares.

The investors were speaking before the government said the bid was being referred to a full Competition Commission investigation.

British Prime Minister David Cameron also said on Monday News Corp should focus on “clearing up” the hacking allegations before pressing ahead with the bid for BSkyB.

The upbeat tone of investors was at odds with uncertainty over Murdoch’s proposed multi-billion pound takeover which drove the shares higher in recent months, and flies in the face of selling which has gathered pace in the past week on concern the deal will fail.

The shares traded up to 7 percent lower on Monday, close to a 700 pence indicative offer made by News Corp last year and nearly 18 percent off the 850 pence hit on July 4.

“Following recent falls and today’s drop, the shares are starting to look attractive regardless of what happens to the NewsCorp bid, although the potential weight of selling from the risk arbs could take the shares lower still,” one head of UK equities at a top 30 investor in BSkyB told Reuters on Monday.

News International, the British arm of News Corp’s global media empire, closed its top-selling News of the World paper after allegations it paid investigators to hack into voicemail accounts of murder victims and war dead.

The phone-hacking scandal, which first surfaced in 2006, has collided with Murdoch’s efforts to win approval from competition watchdogs to buy BSkyB. They are now almost certain to delay the deal, investors said.

A second UK fund manager with several million BSkyB shares told Reuters his investment house could be tempted to grow its stake at the expense of time-poor hedge funds which had little stomach for months of waiting for clarity on News Corp’s plans.

“The underlying strength of the business and the cash that it throws off, particularly since they have very little further systems investment to do, does make it look quite interesting from here,” the manager said.

“I think the company will at some point get taken out but, even if it doesn’t, there’s a great opportunity to return a lot of cash via special dividends or growing the ordinary dividend.”

This continued belief in BSkyB’s value echoes comments by the head of hedge fund Odey Asset Management, who said on Sunday it had bought some 3 million shares in the past week.

But one UK-based investment manager said his firm had run out of patience and started to significantly reduce its stake in BSkyB several days before the latest chapter in the hacking scandal, selling the “vast majority” of its shares.

“We didn’t think Murdoch would pay extra (on BSkyB’s trading price), we didn’t have a huge position and we’d come up with a better idea elsewhere.

“We’d made some nice money in it and we thought we’d move on. We’re now just watching from the sidelines being grateful for small mercies.”

None of the investors contacted by Reuters said they had plans to meet with Murdoch or representatives of News Corp, who have arrived in the UK for crisis management talks with News International CEO Rebekah Brooks.

The lack of one-on-one reassurances on corporate governance or continued good relations with advertisers has failed to roil the majority of investors, however.

“We intend to remain long-term shareholders of BSkyB. People are looking at other aspects of this which we’re not involved with,” said a fourth shareholder.

“The share price has been affected but our view is that will right itself once we’ve moved through the media focus on it, because the long-term valuation on the stock hasn’t changed.”

A fifth investor, among BSkyB’s top 10 shareholders by size, said it would reserve comment until it had reviewed the fast-moving events.

A sixth large shareholder with a passive holding through index tracking funds said it had no plans to engage with BSkyB management, a course of action it would only consider amid exceptional circumstances or controversy.

(Editing by David Hulmes)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Jefferies eyes big deals in ambitious growth drive

July 11, 2011 in Global Markets News


NEW YORK |
Fri Jul 8, 2011 5:01pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Jefferies Group Inc (JEF.N), a midsized brokerage with an equities trading lineage, is making an ambitious bet on investment banking when many of its larger rivals are cutting back.

The bank is hiring aggressively and has ordered its bankers to focus on bigger, more profitable deals to move up the Wall Street pecking order.

Founded almost 50 years ago as a firm that facilitated trading of large blocks of stock by institutional investors off traditional exchanges, Jefferies employs some 3,200 people — 40 percent more than just four years ago.

While Jefferies is boosting staff levels, the bank is also telling its bankers to focus on bigger deals and clients.

The change has accelerated since Jefferies hired healthcare banker Benjamin Lorello from UBS AG (UBSN.VX) in 2009 and named him head of investment banking and capital markets businesses.

Under Lorello, Jefferies has imposed a minimum fee requirement of $2 million for a banker to be allowed to advise a company on a merger deal, sources familiar with the matter said. That’s nearly double the minimum previously in place, and the new rule is more strictly imposed now, one source said.

Its bankers can ask for exceptions, such as when there is an expectation of more business from the client or the deal would help build relationships, the sources said.

“It is more of a message that we are moving upmarket, and we want all of our bankers to focus on moving upmarket and focus on larger transactions,” one source said.

Jefferies declined to comment.

MOVING UP — AT A PRICE

In another sign of this change, the firm in recent months disbanded the Putnam Lovell team that focused on asset management deals that tend to be smaller, the sources said.

It has been hiring from larger rivals instead. They include Michael Tedesco, a former Citigroup Inc (C.N) banker who became global head of technology MA and U.S. head of MA, and Frank Cicero, who came from Barclays Capital (BARC.L) to become global head of financial institutions investment banking.

The hiring has come at a cost. In its second fiscal quarter, Jefferies paid 59 percent of its revenue as compensation, well above the industry standard of about 50 percent and higher than its own pre-financial crisis level of about 54 percent.

By comparison, Goldman Sachs, which pays some of the best salaries on Wall Street, spent 44 percent of its revenue on pay and benefits during the first quarter.

Jefferies says new hires will bring in more deals and its pay ratio will fall as revenues rise. Analysts wonder though whether it can grow fast enough to recoup the investment.

“When you make one of these bets on growth, you better hope the growth continues,” said Brad Hintz, a former Lehman Brothers CFO who is now an analyst at Sanford Bernstein.

The churn is not unusual for Jefferies. The firm hired aggressively, for example, in the downturn after the tech bubble burst at the turn of the century, boosting headcount by 15 percent in 2000 and 18 percent in 2001.

“Better people cost more money,” said Richard Lipstein, a recruiter at Boyden Global Executive Search. “You don’t always hire people who then generate money immediately. So there are times when the compensation ratios will go up before the revenue starts to kick in.”

In the fiscal quarter to the end of May, Jefferies reported a 9 percent rise in net revenue. But higher costs like banker pay drowned those gains and profit fell 3.8 percent.

Jefferies shares are down 21 percent so far this year, lagging the Thomson Reuters U.S. Investment Banking Brokerage Services Index .TRXFLDUSPINBK, which is off 17 percent.

MOVING UP THE RANKS

While Jefferies has already come a long way from its roots as a trading house, it still has a long way to go to fulfill

its ambition of playing in the top league.

Jefferies came in at No. 24 in the worldwide rankings of MA advisers in the first half, up one notch from the same period last year, according to Thomson Reuters data.

Hiring appears to be paying off in some areas. In U.S. healthcare MA deals — a Lorello forte — Jefferies moved up to No. 12 in the first half, compared with No. 47 in the same period in 2008 and No. 16 in 2007.

In league tables for equity capital markets, Jefferies went up one notch to No. 11, the data shows.

The average size of MA deals Jefferies advised on increased to $368 million in the first half, compared with $235 million in 2008 and $214 million in 2007, before Lorello took over. Goldman Sachs’ (GS.N) average deal size in comparison was $1.8 billion in the first half of this year.

Jefferies’ minimum for fees for merger advisory is lower than the $3 million that is typical for the biggest banks. Banker fees are set as a percentage of the deal size. In a $1 billion deal, for instance, fees would typically be 0.75 percent to 1 percent.

The MA transactions on Jefferies’ list are still mostly below $1 billion, but there are some multibillion-dollar deals, such as bankrupt Nortel Networks Corp’s (NRTLQ.PK) $4.5 billion sale of patents to a group of tech giants on July 1.

It can take several years for the transformation to take place, Hintz said.

“We don’t know whether that wager is going to work out,” Hintz said. “But it’s certainly a management team that’s not being shy about its aspirations.”

(Reporting by Paritosh Bansal and Nadia Damouni; additional reporting by Dan Wilchins and Lauren Tara LaCapra. Editing by Knut Engelmann and Robert MacMillan)

Avatar of Admin

by Admin

Blackstone sells stake in China food firm

July 11, 2011 in Banking Industry News


LONDON, July 11 |
Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:32pm EDT

LONDON, July 11 (Reuters) – U.S. private equity firm
Blackstone Group sold its stake in Dili Group earlier
this year after the Chinese agricultural group warned Blackstone
that its involvement would complicate moves to raise prices, the
Financial Times reported on Monday.

Blackstone sold its stake in Dili, the parent company of a
Shandong province vegetable trader, weeks before consumer
product giant Unilever (UNc.AS) was fined in China, the
FT said, citing three sources familiar with the matter.

“Raising prices on food is sensitive, especially when a
foreign private equity firm is involved,” the newspaper quoted
one person with knowledge of the matter as saying.

Blackstone was not immediately available for comment.

In May, China’s National Development and Reform Commission
fined Unilever 2 million yuan ($309,300) for talking about
increasing prices, citing that the company’s comments had
intensified consumers’ “inflationary expectations”.

($1=6.467 Yuan)

(Reporting by Brenda Goh; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)